Skip to content
Compare/Turbopuffer vs Pinecone

Turbopuffer vs Pinecone

Vector DatabasesAI-Native

Overlap

2 companies use both Turbopuffer and Pinecone

Key Differences

Turbopuffer is used by 55 companies while Pinecone is used by 49 companies. 2 companies use both.

Turbopuffer has 3% adoption across tracked AI companies, compared to 3% for Pinecone.

53 companies use only Turbopuffer: Ada, Anthropic, Atlassian, Auctor, Blacksmith, Clay, ClearFeed, Clio, Cognition AI, Contentsquare, Credal, Day.ai, Depot, Docmost, DocsBot, Documentation.AI, Dub, Enterpret, Entire, Eve, Fal, Featurebase, Ferndesk, Fireflies.ai, FLORA, GC AI, Grammarly, Granola, Harvey, Heartbeat, Hedra, Heptabase, Linear, Listen Labs, Liveblocks, Lovable, Mem, Mem0, Mixpanel, Notion, Pace, Plain, Pylon, Ramp, Snipd, Superhuman, Sybill, Tella, Totango, Viktor, Warp, Whimsical, Writer.

47 companies use only Pinecone: 11x.ai, 15Five, 1Mind, Aircall, Alhena AI, Asana, Assembled, Blue J, BuddyPro, ChatBotKit, ChurnZero, ClearPoint Strategy, Cloudbeds, Copy.ai, Coursebox, Crossbeam, DISCO, eesel AI, Fastbots, Filevine, GaggleAMP, Gong, Grafana Labs, Help Scout, HubSpot, Inkeep, MEDDICC, MockFlow, New Relic, OpenAI, OpenEvidence, Perplexity, Planning Center, Pocus, Portkey, Remesh, Shopify, Shortwave, SiteGPT, SiteSpeakAI, Skio, Spekit, tawk.to, Unblocked, Vectorize, Workday, ZoomInfo.

Alternatives (Vector Databases)